Understanding UAVs – Part I – Recent worldwide media attention has put unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the spotlight. Their many different applications make for great headlines – they are being used for military purposes in Pakistan (US Army), for development aid work in Africa (Matternet), and for parcel delivery in Germany (DHL Paket).
Some organizations are using UAVs specifically because of this high level of interest. Good examples are the world’s largest online retailer, Amazon and the world´s largest logistics company DPDHL, which are testing UAV delivery. And countless start-ups have jumped on the bandwagon to gain publicity and boost sales (e.g., Zookal’s stated intention to deliver textbooks via UAVs in Australia).
However, for any emerging technology, it can be a doubleedged sword to attract a lot of attention. There may be considerable benefits from all the limelight; for example, a new technology could stand more chance of receiving subsidies if considered ‘of national importance’. But there is also the danger of creating false expectations – too much initial hype can leave people disillusioned and disappointed after the dust has settled – and there may be a public backlash against the perceived power of new technology to substantially influence and alter our everyday lives.
In addition to typical hype-cycle effects, there are two main drivers for the huge impact of UAVs:
1. The potential for actual disruption in specific industries (including security services, and in film and television) and
2. The emotional response to unmanned flying systems, caused largely by:
a) Privacy concerns and the debate about how much technology should be included in our daily lives (“Do we want to crowd urban skies with UAVs capable of tracking and filming our daily routines?”)
b) Safety concerns
Perhaps the reality of UAV deployment is far less glamorous than the media hype suggests. The ideal mission for a UAV is described as one that is too “dull, dirty, and dangerous” for manned aircraft. The purpose of this report is to provide an introduction to this exciting topic, present use cases from a broad variety of industries, and discuss potential applications in and for the logistics industry. We aim to review the hype and provide a realistic assessment of UAVs.
It is important to distinguish between military and non-military use of UAVs. Until recently, media coverage has focused mainly on military use, coining the term ‘drone’ and leaving many with negative attitudes towards this new technology. Michael Toscano, President of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, is quoted in the Washington Times saying “The word [drone] instantly conjures up mental images of large predators firing missiles at hostile targets around the world”.
This report focuses solely on non-military applications. It is clear though, as with many other examples of technical development, that major advancements are likely to find their roots in military UAV usage and application. In this report, we do not look into very long-distance (e.g., transatlantic) unmanned flight operations, because UAVs capable of performing these operations are likely to function in a comparable way to existing cargo airplanes (e.g., with horizontal take-off at airports).
As such, they are not game-changing in the same way as are smaller UAVs designed to replace road delivery in megacities or overcome infrastructure challenges in Africa. The scope of this report is also limited by timeframe. As technology and the regulatory environment are both subject to substantial change and development, the outlook in this report is restricted to the next ten years.
The regulatory environment plays a crucial role in UAV adoption. Currently, there seems to be little common ground on designing effective rules across borders, let alone continents. Regulations vary widely from country to country. Major legislative changes could be realized over the coming years, particularly in the USA. But regulators are constantly being criticized for moving too slowly on the matter.
Mary Cummings, Director of the MIT Humans and Automation Laboratory, urges politicians to act in her Boston Globe article: “Congress needs to hold the FAA’s feet to the fire before this technology takes flight and leaves the US commercial market behind.” She cites estimations of a USD 10bn yearly loss for the US economy caused by overly strict regulations.
But regulating bodies believe they have solid arguments for taking their time. Amazon’s plans to use UAVs for deliveries have been grounded for the time being, with the FAA declaring that they will not allow UAVs to be used for delivering packages to people for a fee.4 Three major reasons explain why UAV regulation is a delicate matter:
For now, most UAVs operate outside controlled or restricted airspace, and this minimizes interference with other airspace users. But if UAV operations are to become widespread in logistics and other industries, integration will be essential. UAVs will be operating in all types of airspace and sharing this with airplanes, helicopters, and other flying systems. Airspace is already overcrowded in many regions, especially around major cities, and air traffic control operations typically work near to maximum capability.
An out-of-control UAV is a massive threat, capable of bringing down an airplane with several hundred passengers on board. In August 2013, an Alitalia pilot reported sighting a UAV as close as 200 feet to his plane during his final approach to JFK International Airport in New York, triggering investigations by the FBI and the FAA.5 Outside of extreme events and worst-case scenarios, it will still be a substantial challenge to regulate additional UAV traffic and integrate it into existing patterns.
While trains, boats, and to a lesser extent cars follow restricted pathways, UAVs can move anywhere and everywhere. And because they are airborne, failure of a vital system (e.g., the engine or navigation system) could cause the UAV to fall from the sky at any time and place. However, the chance of a system crashing into pedestrians is highly unlikely, even with today’s early UAV designs.
In 2012, the US military drone safety record for the previous 12 months was better than for manned fighters and bombers.6 Nevertheless, effective safety measures and operational procedures in case of engine failure or loss of navigation must be ensured, to guarantee previously defined safety levels that satisfy regulating authorities.
In addition to the tangible (and technically controllable) challenges of congested airspace and inherent risks, there is another, less-defined area of concern in the public domain. Regulators need to address the public’s negative perception of UAVs – there is a general level of fear, and people seem to think UAVs pose some kind of threat. A large part of this fear is probably related to privacy issues: Cameras and other sensors (potentially invisible) attached to the flying system could be used for constant surveillance of every step one takes.
Plans by the national German railway company, Deutsche Bahn, to use UAVs with attached infrared cameras to reduce graffiti attacks on its property7 evoked a strong response with blog entries such as “This is the worst of dystopian science-fiction coming true. This sets the precedent for more of the same throughout the world. And it’s not going to stop at spying on Graffiti Sprayers.”
When talking about the regulatory environment and the adoption of new technologies, it is worth considering the ‘Law of Disruption’ model. This describes an interesting pattern of how fast different types of change manifest themselves, and the model is very applicable to the current UAV situation.
Also read: UAVs Implications in Logistics – Part I
Technological advancements are rushing ahead of social and political change. That is exactly what we see happening with UAVs today. From a technological perspective, various use cases are already feasible, but many of these are not accepted yet by the public. Social change is occurring at a substantially slower pace than this technological progress, and the last domain to react and adapt is the political one. Following this model, we might anticipate regulatory barriers for UAVs to remain in effect for some time.
Want to purchase a high quality drone but have not enough money? Just play slot online and get real quick cash in no time.